重阳节，是中国传统节日，节期为每年农历九月初九。“九”数在《易经》中为阳数，“九九”两阳数相重，故曰“重阳”；因日与月皆逢九，故又称为“重九”。以下是小编整理的gre高分作文【9篇】，欢迎阅读与收藏。
【篇1】gre高分作文
GRE填空技巧：词项释义法
词项释义解法
这种出题思路仿佛是编词典似的，先列出某一词条，然后进行释义，前后两部分构成被解释和解释的关系。只要顺着释义部分的思路，即可推断出被解释的对象。
例 Ⅰ:
The benedictory address, as it has developed in American colleges and universities over the years, has become a very strict form, a literary ---------- that permits very little ---------- .
(A) text ... clarity
(B) work ... tradition
(C) genre ... deviation
(D) oration ... grandiloquence
(E) achievement ... rigidity
〖解答〗
在本题中，“strict form”构成被解释的对象，其后的同位语及定语从句分别对form的 strict作复述式的解释。作为同位语，空格Ⅰ应是form的同义词，则(C) genre最为接近。定语从句中的复述采用了常见的双重否定法。little为第一重否定，故空格Ⅱ应是strict的反义词，则(C) deviation为正确。
〖词汇〗
genre: 1.类型，体裁，式样 2.风俗画
grandiloquence: 大言不惭，夸张
〖中译〗
祝愿辞，正如它在过去几年中业已演化出来的那样，已变成一种甚为严格的形式，一种文学体裁，几乎不允许任何破格之处。
GRE填空技巧：由后及前法
由后及前法
与方法之五的原理恰好相反，本方法是利用题目后一部分中的线索，推断出设置于题目前一部分中空格所需的内涵。
例 Ⅰ:
In ---------- nature, myths use ---------- reasoning, relating the unfamiliar to the familiar by means of likeness.
(A) observing ... logical
(B) appreciating ... irrational
(C) disclosing ... metonymic
(D) interpreting ... analogical
(E) seizing ... fanciful
〖解答〗
先处理空格Ⅱ：因为显然，其后补充说明性质的现代分词短语必会提供线索(参见“具体实战操作——C.中心线索的判断”中的“短语结构”一栏)。神话的逻辑推理方式是怎样的呢? 既然现在分词短语中陈述是“by means of likeness”, 则从“likeness” 求得 (D) analogical为唯一正确的选项。
〖词汇〗
irrational: 非理性的
metonymic: 换喻的，转喻的
(例：The pen is mightier that the sword. 以pen代表文，以sword代表武。)
analogical: 比拟的，类推的
〖中译〗
在对自然作出诠释时，神话利用的是类比推理，将非熟悉之物与熟悉之物通过类似这一手法联系起来。
GRE填空技巧：互补法
互补法
在读完题后，以最快的速度整理区分出两个(甚至三个)概念，当这些概念在题目的另一处被复述时，可用这些已知的概念进行双重或多重互补以达到解题的目的。
例 Ⅰ:
The most technologically advanced societies have been responsible for the greatest ----------; indeed, savagery seems to be in direct proportion to -----.
(A) wars ... viciousness
(B) catastrophes ... ill-will
(C) atrocities ... development
(D) inventions ... know-how
(E) triumphs ... civilization
〖解答〗
在第一个句子中，可从主语中整理出“社会的技术发达”这一概念并将其设定为概念A;即使宾语表现为空格，仍可将其设定为未知的概念B。在两个句子间出现的分号和indeed一词标志着第二个句子是对第一个句子的复述。在第二个句子中，主语savagery由于与第一个句子的概念A(技术的发达)含义不同，故可设定为概念B。自此为止，概念A和B全部已知，只需将savagery移入空格Ⅰ，将advanced变作名语后移入空格Ⅱ，便求得正确选项(C)
atrocities ... development。
〖词汇〗
vicious: 邪恶的，堕落的，恶劣的
catastrophe: 惨祸，灾难性的结局
ill-will: 恶意，怨恨
know-how: 技能，诀窍，实际知识
triumph: 1.胜利，杰出成就 2.狂喜
〖中译〗
技术最为发达的社会必须对最大程度上的残暴负责;诚然，野蛮似乎与技术的发展构成正比。
GRE填空技巧：反面陈述模式法
人类在用语言作出某一陈述或判断时，可采用正面陈述和反面陈述两种方式。所谓正面陈述，即是以一肯定句式作出的表述，如“He is a good person”。所谓反面陈述，即是以一否定句式再加上一个与正面内涵相反的概念作出的表述，如“He is not a bad person” 或 “It is wrong to say that he is a bad person”。很大一部分GRE填空题前后两部分是互为重复或互为说明性质的，其思路大抵均沿袭正面陈述和“否定之否定”的反面陈述这一模式。
例 Ⅰ：
The poet W. H. Auden believed that the greatest poets of his age were almost necessarily irresponsible, that the possession of great gifts ---------- the ---------- to abuse them.
(A) negates ... temptation
(B) controls ... resolution
(C) engenders ... propensity
(D) tempers ... proclivity
(E) obviates ... inclination
〖解答〗
本题在主句谓语动词believed后，继之以两个以that引导的宾语从句，后者以另一角度复述前者内涵。第一个宾语从句中所陈述的中心主题为irresponsible(不负责任的)，带有贬义色彩，这就为第二个宾语从句提供了线索。换言之，出现在第二个宾语从句中的两处空格，应综合体现出前述的“不负责任”这一主题。在空格Ⅱ，五个选项代入后，均无不妥之处，且连同其后作为定语的动词不定式结构，都为贬义色彩。在此情况下，在空格Ⅰ，就再也不能代入任何贬义色彩的选项，否则，“负负得正”的规律会使第二个宾语从句整体上转而带上褒义色彩，故唯有中性色彩的(C) engenders为正确。其余四项代入后均致使事情朝着积极方向发展，无从与此前irresponsible这一主题谐调一致。
〖词汇〗
abuse: 滥用，妄用
negate: 否定，取消，使无效
resolution: 决心，决意，决定
engender: 使发生，造成，招致
propensity: 倾向，习性
temper: 使变淡，使缓和，使温和
proclivity: 癖性，倾向
obviate: 排除，消除，避免
inclination: 倾向，意向，癖好
〖中译〗
诗人W. H. 奥登相信，他那时代最伟大的诗人们几乎都必定是不负责任的;拥有横溢的才华反而导致滥用这些才华的倾向。
GRE填空词汇积累：肯定VS否定
肯定类词汇
allege 非官方的声称 consult 咨询，查阅 sustain 支持 emphasize 强调 endorsement 赞同 assure 断然，确定 support 支持 demonstrate 证明 credible 可信的 saver 品味，体验 triumph 成功 test 证明 enrich 丰富 efficacy 有效 beneficial 有益的 advantage 优秀的
apprehension 理解 immense 无边的 revolution 革命的 breakthrough 突破 milestone 里程碑 fascination 爱好 intensify 强化 evaluate 评估 judging 评判estimate 评估 assert 断言 accept 认可 suggest 说明 enamor 迷恋喜欢 posit 假定
precipitate 促成 believe 相信 propensity 倾向 proclivity 倾向 inclination 倾向 promise 承诺 certainty 确定 determine 决定 feasible 可行的 necessary 必需的 imperative 必要的
available 可用的 inform 获知 confident 自信的 valuable 有价值的 understandable 可理解的 affirm 断言 intriguing 迷人的 insist 坚持 work 起作用 sincerity 真诚 regard 关注 respect 尊敬 adamant 坚定
否定类词汇
repudiate 批判 skepticism 怀疑 censure 责难 rejection 拒绝 relinquishment 放弃 useless 无用的 forestall 阻止 resist 抵抗 obviate 消除 cease 停止 incomprehension 不被理解 heterodox 异端邪说的 disregard 漠视 limit 限制
deter 阻止 hamper 妨碍 disrupt 破坏 impair 破坏 obscure 模糊，不确定 lack 缺少 awe of 恐惧 inhibition 压抑，限制 rancor 怨恨 disappointing 让人失望的 flagged 衰退 reluctant 勉强 refute 反驳 doubt 怀疑 denial 拒绝 impede 阻止 constrain 抑制 suppress 抑制 irresponsible 不负责任的
impaired 破坏 sacrifice 牺牲 withdrawal 收回 weakness 缺点 failure 失败 ineffective 无效的 hostile 敌对的 cruel 残酷的 vulnerable 易受攻击的 counterproductive 反生产的 unpopular 不受欢迎的 impossible 不可能的 nonexistent 不存在的
impractical 不切实际的 ridiculous 荒谬的 folly 愚蠢的 detrimental 有害的 insignificant 不重要的 discredit 怀疑 repudiate 批判 prevent 阻止 defy 反抗 weaken 削弱 doubt 怀疑 banish 驱逐 denounce 指责 eradicate 根除
contrition 悔悟 remorse 懊悔 flaw 缺点 resignation 放弃 hinder 阻碍 delay 延误 futility 无意义的 baffle 阻碍 adversity 灾祸 dismal 沮丧 misleading 误导 unsophisticated 没有智慧的 error 错误 conceal 隐瞒 enigma 谜语 unfounded 无理由的
irrelevant 不相关的 unrealistic 不切实际的 imprudent 轻率地 banal平凡的 repudiation 抛弃 contempt 蔑视 restrict 限制 evade 逃避 hatred 憎恨 negative 否定的 unstable 不稳定的 ineffective 无效的
【篇2】gre高分作文
“Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook.”
I believe this statement is how you look at a glass of water. Either the glass is half full or it is half empty. The opptimist would look for things in life, whereas the pessimist would try to aviod things in life. This summary will explain how looking for things in life better than overlooking a persons involvement in new opportunities and to learn from these new experiences.
I am strong believer in hands on experiences. If I have a open mind, try new things, and look for new answers to my questions about life, I will in the end gain wisdom because I have experienced many new situations. I plan on becoming a speech language pathologist in the future. In this field I will be dealing with clients who may have a disorder, such as autism or a cognitive delay. I must be aware of the red flags that identify these disorders. I must look for the obvious symptoms before I can overlook anything. If I would in my mind tell my self to overlook things. The result would be detrimental to my career and the individual I am treating.
Who can predict the future? So how can someone purposely overlook an experience in which they may recieve a life lesson or gain knowledge. In conclusion, a person should look at the glass half full. No one can predict the future so how can one know what to overlook. Look for things in life, you may even stumble across that wisdom you were looking for in the first place.
Comments:
This response displays some competence analytic writing since it presents a position on the issue and has a clear pattern of organization.
The opening paragraph introduces the topic and states a position that neither agrees or disagrees completely with the stated claim. The second paragraph presents an example; and the last paragraph provides a clear conclusion. The one example is minimally developed, however, and does not clearly explain “how looking for things in life [is] better than overlooking a person[抅s involvement in new opportunities.”
There are numerous small errors and problems in sentence structure (e.g., “If I would in my mind tell my self to overlook things.”), but they do not seriously interfere with meaning. Thus, this response meets the criteria for a score of 3.
【篇3】gre高分作文
GRE写作：高分必备技巧
一、找准主题，集中突破
一个好的主题，通常都是采用滴水映海洋，粒沙藏世界的手法。从一滴水里能看到大海的样子，从一粒沙中能展现整个世界，这是多么地不容易呀!但是，好主题通常就是这样表达出来的。每位GRE作文考友专业背景、准备时间与英语基础各不一样，在作文中面临的问题当然也不一样：有些是语言和思想都很出色，有些是有思想但表达不出来，有些是英语好但思路打不开，一个作文小组只有几个人或者十几个人，就能够看出这些差别来，用一种统一的方法来进行准备，未必对每个人都意味着高效率。
二、避免低效率低水平
写作能力很强的同学，通常的一件事会把握怎样写，如何写，哪些该祥，哪些该略，哪些该修饰，哪些该平白，驾驭文字的功夫很是了得。文采不是每个人天生就有的，它是一个逐步积累、逐步升华、逐步成熟的过程，需要去大量阅读、长期积累、心灵感悟、凝练提取的再创造本领，这要在日常学习中逐步提高，很多GRE作文考友干劲十足，一天一篇issue或者argument，但如果基本问题不解决而沉溺于题海战术中，往往是事倍功半。即使GRE作文考友帮助你修改得很好，但你并不能透彻了解自己语法或者思维方式错误的根源在哪里，那就只能寄希望于把每一篇改过的都背下来然后在考试时碰上。如果记得不牢或者根本没碰上，问题就大了。我喜欢实践-理论-实践这种螺旋式的进步方法，先找到问题，然后有针对性地进行系统性的学习，打好基础;感觉有提高了再来实践，再发现问题再提高。
三、重点准备GRE作文提纲
这一点是承接第二点的。题海战术有两个问题：一是没有解决根本问题，二是机会成本过高。所谓机会成本，就是你花的时间过多，而这些时间本来可以用来做更有意义的事情，比如说记单词，学习语法或者看书开拓思路。设想你英文很差，但你写作很努力，在考试时又碰上了写过的题目，你的作文得了5分以上，但verbal只有300多分，人家一眼就能看出你的真实水平来。所以我觉得在打基础的同时，要把重点放在提纲也就是思路的准备上。
四、选择性地练习实战写作
试想一下，如果你在考试时面对题目，最可能使你心慌的是什么?那可能就是这道题没见过，不知从哪下手;如果你想过了，即使你没写过，你也不会太紧张。我备考时只写了两篇issue和两篇argument，时间主要花在熟悉题目上，argument看得少一些，issue看了一半左右，有点轻敌了，如果全看的话就会更沉着。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“It is unfortunate that today"s educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators" duty to determine the curriculum and the students" duty to study what is presented to them.”
Today some educators place much emphasis on what students want,there is a conflict about what is the educator"s duty for what educatee should get.
Normally, the college or university in our country ,students just study what they are tought,it is the professor"s duty to dermine what should appear in the classroom.Nowday china has taken the polices of opening reforming,every thing chang vastly.Students can"t get the job position from goverment authority but must look for the work chance by themself ,so students have taken great care to what they learn int the college and what kind of knowlege does the job market need.If our high education institute ignore this chang and keep the tranditional teaching method,it will seem as wast student"s time and money and the colleges will lost their student.
It may be the best way for the developing country to reform their high education system, especially with those majors that closely connected with market or industry application.we must give our student most upcoming technolegy or skill to meet the need of outdoor of our college,the information from students may be the best reference for the educator to determine what they should take to the classroom.
COMMENTARY
This essay displays little ability to develop and organize a coherent response to the topic.
The essay takes the position that China needs to reform its traditional approach to curriculum by becoming more student centered and technologically current. However, the reader has to work hard to decipher the generally confusing line of reasoning, which does not obviously address the central issue presented in the topic.
There is an attempt to organize the argument into a three-paragraph essay, but the one-sentence introduction is simply a variation of the topic statement. The brief body of the essay does not advance an opinion in a coherent manner, and the final paragraph shifts the focus to the need for technology in the curriculum.
The errors (comma splices, misspellings, verb problems, etc.) are so intrusive that coherence remains a problem.
This essay would need considerable rewriting in order to earn a higher score than 1.
GRE写作满分范文赏析
“It is unfortunate that today"s educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators" duty to determine the curriculum and the students" duty to study what is presented to them.”
There are many school violences in each school. Those are big problems to our govenment and social. School violences effect the studying of students. This is very serious, even some students are nervious to go school. In fact, the government must give students a clean place to study. Teachers should help students know it is a duty to study. So, everyone should face those big problems.
Do we know what are students" ideas? Do the educators try to know? Most educators hope the govenment can give students more and help them more. These are people"s hope. But it is so unfortunate that students can"t have a good place to study. Also, teachers have to teach the students. Not that students can know what to study by themself. In the compus, there are many guys sell the drugs and acohol to younger students. Why those guys can go into the school? That is also the main problem.
When we were little, we didn"t know what is correct and what is wrong. So we lose ourself easily. At the same time, we need much care from parents and teachers. So our teachers and parents play the important roles and they own must do better. Because some students learn some bad habits from their teachers and parents.
If we want to resolve all the problems, we must face the problems and find out the reasons, then try to resolve them. We also must care all students. If we can help them, tring to do our best. Then, the problems will become less and less.
COMMENTARY
This is a seriously flawed response to the topic. The writer begins by discussing school violence and the need for a good place to study, parental and teacher influence, and resolution of school problems. The issue of who should determine the curriculum, teachers or students, is implied but not addressed directly. In fact, teacher-directed learning seems to be a small point in a series of concerns related to school violence. The development of a position on the issue is unfocused and disorganized. Even the example, drug selling, relates to school violence and not to curricular responsibility.
Language errors are numerous. Problems with correct use of tense, diction, word order, sentence structure, and subject-verb agreement also interfere with meaning. Had the writer not included references to teachers helping students know what to study, the essay would probably have received a score of 1 instead of a 2.
【篇4】gre高分作文
GRE作文高分经验分享
第一，文章开始点明中心句
在每一段开始的第一行，最好能明确地表达你想说什么，也就是中心句。
这做法虽然死板，但往往有奇效。特别是对自己逻辑推理不是很有信心的各位，说清楚了，没说全面总比说都没说清楚要好。
第二，写作这个东西其实是相通的
我们中的很大一部分在高考结束后恐怕很少再写这么长的，同时主题又相对深刻的文字。英文只是一个表达方式，而论证过程则和中文没有任何区别。如果实在觉得难以上手，不妨先试试写一篇自己认为很深刻的中文文章看看。在逻辑和思想方面，这样的训练方式会有奇效，同时对于心理是一个不小的鼓舞。
第三，有关范文
范文是一定要看的，看什么。我建议，开始的时候，不要纠结于某某单词的某某用法，大不了你写的时候不用就是了。要大略的看，看作者是怎么展开题目，从哪几个方面入手，各自怎么论证的。
很重要的一点是，不要迷信范文。没有任何证据表明你看到的这篇范文出自一位逻辑学大师的手，即便确实如此，对于同一问题有不同的见解这是再正常不过的事情。思路可以借鉴，但千万不要僵化。
与此本质相同的另一个方法是，请别人改作文，就观点改或就文字改，按个人情况取舍。
第四，专门练习句子
如果真的想兼顾文字，不如在练逻辑练累的时候(我知道很容易累，很枯燥)，专门拿出一点时间去写一些句子，效果更好。
如果说模版的话，这样就足够了。模版这个东西，背太多没好处，太容易局限思维，还有雷同的风险。
第五，培养找到错误的能力
还要说明一点，以上是针对整个AW而言。对于argument，特别需要注意的是培养找到错误的能力。
具体方法是，阅读一定量的题目。
这样的好处有二：
一、通过阅读题目，只找错误来训练。
二、没有谁能保证argument里面不会出现一个你不认识的"单词，万一是个关键词，那可就……
argument其实和issue也是想通的，锻炼一者的同时另一者一定也会提高，所以不要纠结浪费时间的问题。
第六，关于机经
我的意见是，反正写什么都是写，不如按照机经写。当然，如果能写很多很多，那我的意见没有什么参考价值。
综上所述，要想获得新GRE满分作文，掌握正确的复习方法是很重要的，各位考生可以结合自身的具体情况，参考以上这六种经验总结来帮助自己获得新GRE写作高分。
【篇5】gre高分作文
“Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook.”
I disagree with the opinion expressed above, in that I feel that the statement is omitting a very big part of what learning is all about. I firmly believe that wisdom is gained by careful observation of all that is around us in our lives. We gain a great deal by watching those around us, or by observing our surroundings, as well as watching the assembly of an object. All my life, I have learned a great deal by being very observant of people and their reactions to certain situations, or to procedures that are to be followed. Being observant has helped tremendously in travelling as well, since it has helped me recall certain landmarks to know if I am going in the correct direction. It is true that if we pay too much attention to insignificant detail, we clutter our minds with too much that is unnecesssary. Instead, we should have more time to devote our attention to that which is meaningful. In the field of science, we teach our students to be observant, and to look for specific reactions. If they don"t learn to watch closely and record their data precisely, their results will be less than adequate, and their data will most likely not be very accurate or dependable. The statement above has merit, but it does not represent widsom in its entirety. It doesn"t do justice to the great amount of learning that thas taken place through the ages through simple observation. Our forefathers survived by learning and knowing what to look for. That information was then passed on, so each successive generation didn"t have to gather the same basic knowledge, but could build on what had already been learned. As a society, we need to lean on those who come before us, to learn valuable lessons from their experience, and to decipher that which we can improve on and that which is steadfast through the ages.
Comments:
This response presents a competent analysis of the issue, taking a position contrary to that expressed in the prompt, at least initially.
After stating the importance of “careful observation of all that is around us,” the response presents reasons and examples to support that position. The examples are clear and relevant, although the analysis is fairly brief. Also, the organization and focus of the response weakens a little, especially as the writer interrupts the group of examples with a statement that “if we pay too much attention to insignificant detail, we will clutter our minds with too much that is unnecessary.” This statement modifies -- and weakens -- the initial position, which the writer believed “firmly.”
The writer抯 ideas are conveyed with reasonable clarity, but -- as is evident in the closing sentence -- this response lacks the skillful use of sentence structure and vocabulary that communicate meaning in responses that typically earn higher scores.
【篇6】gre高分作文
“In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives.”??
In?this?era?of?rapid?social?and?technological?change?leading?to?increasing?life?complexity?and?psychological?displacement,?both?positive?and?negative?effects?among?persons?in?Western?society?call?for?a?balance?in?which?there?are?both?specialists?and?generalists.??
Specialists?are?necessary?in?order?to?allow?society?as?a?whole?to?properly?and?usefully?assimilate?the?masses?of?new?information?and?knowledge?that?have?come?out?of?research?and?have?been?widely?
disseminated?through?mass?global?media.?As?the?head?of?Pharmacology?at?my?university?once?said?(and?I?paraphrase):?“I?can?only?research?what?I?do?because?there?are?so?many?who?have?come?before?me?to?whom?I?can?turn?for?basic?knowledge.?It?is?only?because?of?each?of?the?narrowly?focussed?individuals?at?each?step?that?a?full?and?true?understanding?of?the?complexities?of?life?can?be?had.?Each?person?can?only?hold?enough?knowledge?to?add?one?small?rung?to?the?ladder,?but?together?we?can?climb?to?the?moon.”?This?illustrates?the?point?that?our?societies?level?of?knowledge?and?technology?is?at?a?stage?in?which?there?simply?must?be?specialists?in?order?for?our?society?to?take?advantage?of?the?information?available?to?us.?
Simply?put,?without?specialists,?our?society?would?find?itself?bogged?down?in?the?Sargasso?sea?of?information?overload.?While?it?was?fine?for?early?physicists?to?learn?and?understand?the?few?laws?and?ideas?that?existed?during?their?times,?now,?no?one?individual?can?possibly?digest?and?assimilate?all?of?the?knowledge?in?any?given?area.??
On?the?other?hand,?Over?specialization?means?narrow?focii?in?which?people?can?lose?the?larger?picture.?No?one?can?hope?to?understand?the?human?body?by?only?inspecting?one"s?own?toe-nails.?What?we?learn?from?a?narrow?focus?may?be?internally?logically?coherent?but?may?be?irrelevant?or?fallacious?within?the?framework?of?a?broader?perspective.?Further,?if?we?inspect?only?our?toe-nails,?we?may?conclude?that?the?whole?body?is?hard?and?white.?Useful?conclusions?and?thus?perhaps?useful?inventions?must?come?by?sharing?among?specialists.?Simply?throwing?out?various?discoveries?means?we?have?a?pile?of?useless?discoveries,?it?is?only?when?one?can?make?with?them?a?mosaic?that?we?can?see?that?they?may?form?a?picture.??
Not?only?may?over-specialization?be?dangerous?in?terms?of?the?truth,?purity?and?cohesion?of?knowledge,?but?it?can?also?serve?to?drown?moral?or?universal?issues.?Generalists?and?only?generalists?can?see?a?broad?enough?picture?to?realize?and?introduce?to?the?world?the?problems?of?the?environment.?With?
specialization,?each?person?focusses?on?their?research?and?their?goals.?Thus,?industrialization,?expansion,?and?new?technologies?are?driven?ahead.?Meanwhile?no?individual?can?see?the?wholisitc?view?of?our?
global?existence?in?which?true?advancement?may?mean?stifling?individual?specialists?for?the?greater?good?of?all.??
Finally,?over-specialization?in?a?people"s?daily?lives?and?jobs?has?meant?personal?and?psychological?compartmentalization.?People?are?forced?into?pigeon?holes?early?in?life?(at?least?by?university)?and?must?consciously?attempt?to?consume?external?forms?of?stimuli?and?information?in?order?not?to?be?lost?in?their?small?and?isolated?universe.?Not?only?does?this?make?for?narrowly?focussed?and?generally?
poorly-educated?individuals,?but?it?guarantees?a?sense?of?loss?of?community,?often?followed?by?a?feeling?of?psychological?displacement?and?personal?dissatisfaction.??
Without?generalists,?society?becomes?inward-looking?and?eventually?inefficient.?Without?a?society?that?recognizes?the?importance?of?broad-mindedness?and?fora?a?for?sharing?generalities,?individuals?become?isolated.?Thus,?while?our?form?of?society?necessitates?specialists,?generalists?are?equally?important.?
Specialists?drive?us?forward?in?a?series?of?thrusts?while?generalists?make?sure?we?are?still?on?the?jousting?field?and?know?what?the?stakes?are.
COMMENTARY?
This?outstanding?response?displays?insightful?analysis,?meticulous?development,?impressive?vocabulary?and?a?mastery?of?the?elements?of?effective?writing.?The?writer?disagrees?with?the?stated?opinions?by?arguing?that?specialists?and?generalists?are?both?vital:?specialists?prevent?us?from?becoming?“bogged?down?in?the?Sargasso?sea?of?information?overload,”?while?generalists?provide?help?to?see?“the?big?picture”?and,?unlike?specialists,?protect?our?“greater?good.”??
The?essay?is?carefully?constructed?throughout,?enabling?the?reader?to?move?effortlessly?from?point?to?point?as?the?writer?examines?the?multi-faceted?implications?of?the?issue?and?provides?compelling?reasons?and?examples?to?support?the?premise?and?take?the?argument?to?an?effective?conclusion.?Although?other?“6”?responses?may?not?be?as?eloquent?as?this?essay,?they?nevertheless?all?display?the?test?taker"s?ability?to?articulate?complex?ideas?effectively?and?precisely.?
【篇7】gre高分作文
GRE写作高分经验分享 立论驳论文提分心得不可不看
以下就是我自己总结一点小技巧：首先，我在准备GRE写作备考时，最重要的一个步骤在于熟悉题库和认真准备提纲。
GRE立论文issue经验分享
对于立论文(Issue)说，我觉得自己动手拟一份提纲是非常有用的，你可以参考各种资料，但必须勤动脑，想一想提纲的逻辑连续性。实际上，有偏向性、但又不要绝对化的思路才是最易上手的。
GRE驳论文argument怎么练?
对于驳论文(Argument)而言，我认为熟悉题库更为重要。正常情况下是这样的，但的确有些难题若不事先好好准备，五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时，我正是因为在准备时放掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目，而在正式考试时恰恰碰到了这道题目，所以写得很不好。
写驳论文有很多小窍门，如需要锻炼出区别“事实”和“观点”的能力，不论题目中所给的事实有多夸张都需认为它是对的，不能攻击，只能攻击观点中的逻辑漏洞;凡是跟统计数字、统计方法有关的逻辑错误都尽量不要攻击，最多只能一笔带过等等。
GRE作文逻辑重要吗?
虽然逻辑作文满分只有6分，可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说，它是GRE的精华——因为GRE考的就是逻辑，用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已，主要目的就是考察你的逻辑分析水平。
怎样看待GRE作文中的语言水平?
至于GRE作文的语言，其实不是很重要，只要通顺、没有语法错误就可以了，掌握了这些就可以更好地备考GRE作文。希望可以给大家一些参考，从而更好地备考GRE阅读考试。
新GRE写作：审查的公正性
题目：
Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
审查很少能够做到公正。
范文：
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while to arouse applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.
The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.
Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.
新GRE写作：权威问题
题目：
Much of the information that people assume is ‘factual’ actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a ‘fact’ should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。
范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so, I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things, however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer"s assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with, the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to argue that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno, the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for, while just a minor particle in it. Equally, no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity, the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one, and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However, what do change are the human"s objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that, due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability, they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time, our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits, the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases, and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism, no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr, because their theories are based on distinct views, the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts, these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament, the conclusions we make might well be justifiable, if not completely right, to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application, instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body, they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients, of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up, while I advocate the speaker"s opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately, for the reason of the limitation of the abilities, I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves, as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis, I would argue once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable, we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
【篇8】gre高分作文
1. According to a recent survey,four million people die each year from diseases linked to smoking.
2.The latest surveys show that quite a few children have unpleasant associations with homework.
3. No invention has received more praise and abuse than Internet.
4. People seem to fail to take into account the fact that education does not end with graduation.
5. An increasing number of people are beginning to realize that education is not complete with graduation.
6. When it comes to education, the majority of people believe that education is a lifetime study.
7. Many experts point out that physical exercise contributes directly to a person"s physical fitness.
8. Proper measures must be taken to limit the number of foreign tourists and the great efforts should be made to protect local environment and history from the harmful effects of international tourism.
9. An increasing number of experts believe that migrants will exert positive effects on construction of city. However, this opinion is now being questioned by more and more city residents, who complain that the migrants have brought many serious problems like crime and prostitution.
10. Many city residents complain that it is so few buses in their city that they have to spend much more time waiting for a bus, which is usually crowded with a large number of passengers.
【篇9】gre高分作文
高分GRE考试作文如何写
1. 必须研究范文
研究范文，尤其是5分和6分的范文是非常重要的。因为范文可以说是最权威的辅导资料。要求不是简单的熟读和背诵，而是逐字逐句的体会作者的意思及修辞。看范文的同时也要看ETS对范文的评论，非常精彩，也可以参考学习。这会非常有利于理解考试所考的重点。
2. 养成联想思维能力
必须要做到形成惯性思维，考试时间非常紧张，只有有充分思维准备的人，才能驾轻就熟，运用自如。题目中提到politics，大脑中就应当出现Franklin Roosevelt， Lincoln， Gerhard Schroeder， Gandhi; 提到art，就该想到Rembrandt， Van Gogh， Starry night， night watch， Hemmingway， the old man and the sea; 提到Scandal，就该想到Nixon，Watergate，bill Clinton，sex sandal，Enron。总之，熟练非常重要.
3. 借鉴别人的文章
学习他人的文章和写作思路，是提高自己水平的有效途径。参考优秀的高分满分作文，学习词汇和句式的用法，总结经验心得，对于自己的提升也是巨大的。
4. 多动脑筋多思考
多写不如多改，多改不如多想，针对写作思路，自我总结，思考适合自己的写作方式，思考自己擅长的论证方法，总之，要多想。活跃思维的同时也提高了思考能力。
5. 通读GRE作文题库
GRE作文的题库是完全开放的，考前把题目都过一遍，了解其中的思路和写作方式，在考试中碰到可以大量节省时间，提高写作效率。
6. 准备原创作文例子
必须要有自己的例子。没有哪个考官会喜欢几百号人都说Van Gogh， Einstein， Curie。要结合自身经历，准备一些比较独家又有代表性的例子。
GRE写作高分经验：模仿别人的优秀文章
所有的写作都是从模仿开始。参考他人的文章，学习别人的写法，最后写出自己的文章。模仿有几个前提条件：
1.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是带有说理性的文章)
2.要理解这篇文章，理解它的用词、句子结构、段落结构
3.这些文章最好具备正确的中文翻译和适当的文章长度
具体做法：首先分析文章，分析每一句和上一句的关系。美国人写作文的一个特点是，通常每段的第一句就包含整段文字的内容，也就是我们常说的topic sentence。另一个特点是当你写完一个句子后，你要多问为什么。提出一个问题，然后给出一个圆满的回答，这就是一篇优秀的作文。
GRE写作高分经验：提高逻辑思维能力
在众多英语类写作考试中，托福写作是相对容易的。因为它的作文题本身非常简单，看到一个作文题你几乎就知道该怎么写。而GRE作文就相对复杂了。GRE作文方式永远是两种态度，两种方式让你选择。它永远是有对照性的。TOEFL作文考：“吃饭是在家里吃好，还是到饭店里吃好”; GRE作文考得就是：“在我们这个社会中间，现在专业人士太多了，而有综合知识的人太少了。你认为我们是更需要具有专业知识的人呢，还是需要具有广博知识的人?”TOEFL考生活、学习;GRE考日常学术行为。但是不管它出什么题目，总是会摆出两种态度供你选择。另外，GRE的作文题目是提前发给你的，考试时出的题目绝不会超出它事先发给你的题目。GRE决不会出让学生看不懂的题目。所出的题目永远是世界性的，不涉及民族、宗教、政治色彩。
所以，真正写的时候，先把第一段和最后一段都写了，然后每段写个第一句，列出框架。最好能在第一段把你要写的内容都先简要概括一下。最后自己再总结一下这个框架的逻辑结构，看看有没有什么问题。
关于ISSUE，方法也差不多，主要的问题就是写提纲一定要仔细，把你对这个问题的观点，和引用的例子都写出来，准备好写作提纲。写的例子要放在提纲里，ISSUE跟A也一样，写完一遍提纲，自己重新看，到最后就是训练自己看到一个题，在2分钟以内迅速组织出一个比较详细的提纲。这样ISSUE的准备也就差不多了。
GRE写作范文：忠诚
GRE写作题目：
Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty-whether to one‘s friends， to one’s school or place of employment， or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.
大多数人被告知忠诚是一种美德。但是无论是对朋友、对学校、对单位还是对任何机构，忠诚时常都是弊大于利的。
GRE写作范文：
I disagree with the author for he has confused the faithfulness with the misguided or overextended loyalty. In fact， loyalty does be a cherished virtue that should be given enough emphasis.
Loyalty， a kind of lasting persistence and its precondition is that the subject of fidelity is worthy of such strong emotion. In each society， loyalty is a indispensable and vital part of the system of morality. No matter in schools， at home or at work， first midst and last， people accept a similar education that as an individual， he or she should first have a sense of ligeance， that is work for the whole. Of course， the subjects of loyalty are various including scientific theory， friends， family， schools， places of employment and the nation. A vivid example can lend support to the statement is the heroical astronomer - Bronow， who advanced Copernicus‘ theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun， enraged the Roma church that held the Ptolemaic system of astronomy and was burnt to death just because he refused to give up his scientific theory. It is the lasting loyalty toward truth that lead Bronow to sacrifice himself. And people all respect such duteous spirit. However， without loyalty， the morality of a society will deteriorate into apathy desert and everyone just lives for him /herself， that is to say， no one is willing to pay loyalty to the whole， then finally the human civilization will fall apart.
However， on the other hand， the fidelity should not be confused with misguided or overextended loyalty and the latter is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force. People all hold that mutual loyalty between friends is the basis of lasting friendship. But people should also realize that true loyalty and authentic responsibility for a friend are not only always believing him or her unconditionally but also persuading， helping and even impeaching him or her when him or her has committed serious mistakes or even crimes. Of course， when facing up to such painful dilemma， each one will hesitate because he or she is afraid of being censured to betray his or her friend and some one may choose to keep slient in order to insist of the so-called loyalty.
In fact， such behavior may prevent his or her friend from taking right actions. The same to a school， a family， a company even the nation， when the subject that people once string along with no longer deserves loyalty， people should resolutely choose to be loyal to the truth， the justice and the humanity. That calls for people are always alert to what they think right and what they think wrong， via doing so， people can change their mind for right choice on time.
To sum up， people should insist on true loyalty， and always avoid being the victim of the misguided or overextended loyalty. In the world， there is nothing that can be always absolutely right or wrong and changing happens all the time. So people should always hold deep insight to discern what deserves their loyalty and what does not.
GRE写作官方题库高频ARGUMENT题目满分范文分享：construction of new electric plants
GRE作文官方题库ARGUMENT题目：
The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company:
“Several recent surveys indicate that homeowners are increasingly eager to conserve energy and manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances, such as refrigerators and air conditioners that are almost twice as energy-efficient as those sold a decade ago. Also, new technologies for better home insulation and passive solar heating are readily available to reduce the energy needed for home heating. Therefore, we anticipate that the total demand for electricity in our area will not increase, and may decline slightly. Since our three electric generating plants in operation for the past 20 years have always met our needs, construction of new generating plants should not be necessary.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
【满分范文赏析】
The author of this memo concludes that there is no need for an additional electric power plant in the area because total electricity demand in the area is not likely to increase in the future. To support this conclusion the author cites the availability of new energy-efficient appliances and systems for homes, and the eagerness of area homeowners to conserve energy. However, the argument relies on several questionable assumptions.
【本段结构】
本文采用了标准的Argument开头段结构，即C—A—F的开头结构。本段首先概括原文的Conclusion，之后简要提及原文为支持其结论所引用的一系列Assumption及细节，最后给出开头段到正文段的过渡句，指出原文的Flaw，即这些Assumption无法让原文逻辑上没有问题。
【本段功能】
作为Argument开头段，本段具体功能就在于发起攻击并概括原文的结论，即因为供电量会下降，没有必要新建额外的发电厂。本段接下来提到了原文中为支持之前的Conclusion所提供的证据，包括新型的节能家电用具以及当地人们想要节约能源的愿望。文章提及这些信息，为是在正文段中对这些Assumption即将进行的具体攻击做铺垫。
First, the author"s projection for flat or declining total demand for electricity ignores business and commercial electricity usage. It is entirely possible that area businesses will increase their use of electricity in the future and that total electricity consumption will actually increase despite flat or declining residential demand. The author"s projection also ignores the possibility that the number of area residents will increase in the future, thereby resulting in an increase in electricity usage regardless of whether more efficient appliances are used in area homes. Without taking these possibilities into account the recommendation above is incomplete.
【本段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即先是提及原文的第一个逻辑错误，之后分析该逻辑错误的原因，接下来，进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。
【本段功能】
作为正文第一段，本段攻击原文所犯的第一个重要逻辑错误——因果类错误。原文当中假设当地居民用电量的下降会导致整体上的用电需求量下降，但是这一假设忽视了和用电量相关的其它作用因素，比如商业用电量和当地居民人口。因此在没有考虑这些因素的情况下，原文当中的这个观点是不合理的。
Secondly, the author"s conclusion relies on the assumption that area residents have the capability and will purchase the energy-saving appliances and systems that are currently available. Admittedly, the author points out homeowners are “eager to conserve energy.” Nevertheless, these homeowners might not be able to afford these new systems and appliances. Moreover, the energy-efficient insulation that the author mentions might only be available for new home construction. In that case, the mere availability of this system will have no effect on total electric usage in existing homes.
【本段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即先是提及原文的第二个逻辑错误，之后分析该逻辑错误的原因，接下来，进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。
【本段功能】
作为正文第二段，本段攻击原文所犯的第二个重要逻辑错误——因果类错误。原文假设因为新型家用电器的存在，用电量会下降。但是仍旧存在其他因素会对这一预期的结果产生影响。在没有考虑到这些因素的情况下，原文的这个观点是没有说服力的。
A final problem involves the assertion that no new electric power plants are needed because the three existing plants, which are 20 years old, have always been adequate for the area"s electric needs. The author fails to account for the possibility that the old plants are themselves less energy efficient than a new plant using new technology would be, or that the old plants need to be replaced due to their age, or for some other reason. Besides, this assertion ignores the possible influx of residents or businesses in the future, thereby increasing the demand for electricity beyond what the three existing plants can meet.
【本段结构】
本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构，即先是提及原文的第三个逻辑错误，之后分析该逻辑错误的原因，接下来，进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。
【本段功能】
作为正文第三段，本段攻击原文所犯的第三个重要逻辑错误——因果类错误。原文假设既然用电量会下降，那么发电厂设备就不需要更新换代。但是，除此之外还包括其他相关因素会导致不同的结果，比如发电厂的工作效率问题。在没有考虑到这些因素的情况下，原文的这个假设不是合理的。
http://m.scabjd.com/yingyu/248804/
